Alice's tale of self-discovery in Wonderland and in the Looking Glass has resonated through pop-culture for decades, long after the book's publication.
However, as the satirical aspects of the book have become less relevant with time, the story has evolved along with the era.
This blog is created by the students in English 372, The 19th-Century Novel, at Colorado College, for Block 5, 2012-13. We will be sharing our views on Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre, Charles Dickens' Our Mutual Friend, Lewis Carroll's Alice books, and H. G. Wells' The Island of Dr. Moreau.
Friday, February 8, 2013
The Quest
http://derrickbang.blogspot.com/2010/03/alice-in-wonderland-its-wonder.html |
The idea of the hero’s quest is one
that fascinates me, and has fascinated many others, with the Alice books. To inherit the culture that we are
born into is to inherit the idea of a hero, and we seem to embellish the ideas
ourselves before passing it on. Thus, the hero is an archetype, one that is
almost universal, in world literature. Joseph Campbell points out a few
characteristics that great heroes, especially in the Western literary
tradition, share. They begin by showing signs of a vocation, then by refusing
to carry it out until their conscience, or a divine being, has interfered and
told them to do so. Then there is the inevitable journey that they embark upon,
the trials they face and the sacrifices they make, before they are able to
return to the fold of the community they left. Their actions have consequences
that are far-reaching, and very significant to their own literary words. They
are the heroes that are ever-present in the popular imagination, like David,
who killed Goliath, or Odysseus, whose quicksilver mind turned the tide of war
on foreign shores. However, sometimes, this archetype had been subverted in
literature to create a new type of hero, in a different paradigm. Subversion
such as this forces readers to step outside of the hero paradigm they are
familiar with and examine these works in a new light. Most importantly, it
leads to the questioning of the ‘hero’ archetype in itself, and why it is an
important archetype for the human imagination.
The idea of a hero is present within the Alice
book,s and becomes meta-textual in Through The Looking-Glass. Alice, like the
hero in the poem Jabberowocky, is cast in the mould of a subversive hero, almost an anti hero. In the
poem, the hero kills the Jabberwock, but that in itself has no far reaching
consequences. The first and the last stanzas of the poem are essentially the
same, which means that his heroic act of killing the Jabberwock has done
absolutely nothing to change the world that he lives in. Indeed, in order to be
a hero, he had to leave his world and seek the world of the woods. Similarly,
Alice, in escaping first to Wonderland and then the Looking Glass World, is
trying to claim the identity of a heroine. Her social paradigm in the real
world prevent her from being a hero. The thing that comes closest to being
heroic in either of the books in the Real World is Alice untangling the yarn.
In order to be a hero, Alice needs to enter a different, fantastical world. She
needs the liminal space that the Carnivalesque offers to claim this identity.
And why is that important? Because it is an initiation rite. The argument that
I wish to make here, then, is that Alice, in order to grow up, needs to undergo
a hero’s quest as an initiation rite, and can only access these rites in worlds
that are not her own. Her wish to become a queen, or her assertiveness in the
courtroom are all manifestations of the completion, of sorts, of her hero’s
quest. Her own world is static, with no fluidity or movement. Thus, for any
sort of growth to occur, she needs to leave this world and come back to it
after having grown up. Moreover, these fantasy worlds becomes spaces for the
fulfilment of wishes that cannot happen in Alice’s world. These fulfilled
wishes don’t always come with desirable consequences, hence the nightmarish
quality that pervades the fantasies, but they happen, which is more than can be said for the real world.
Alice as "the Most Interesting Man in the World" meme
'"But it's no use now," thought poor Alice, 'to pretend to be two people! Why, there's hardly enough of me left to make one respectable person!'"
In Alice in Wonderland, Alice often struggles internally trying to reconcile her childlike curiosity, naivety, and desire to fit in amongst an adult driven world. Crying when nervous or upset is a childlike reaction that is normal for a girl her age to express, and yet a part of her suppresses this tendency in order to appear and feel more mature. At many points in the novel, she seems to struggle between two entirely different 'selves.'
In several scenes, she attempts to control her emotions and childish responses by forcing herself not to cry. (Follow link for meme!) During the scene in the linked image, her interactions with the moody animals in Wonderland are not entirely positive, which continues throughout the novel.
Not Always A Wonderland
Though I read the book and watched the movie as a young
child, I never realized what a disconcerting and off-kilter world Alice
inhabits in Caroll’s “Wonderland.” From her falling down the rabbit-hole to
being attacked the court of cards, Alice never seems to be at one with her
surroundings. Strange things happen in this unpredictable world and offer no
explanation. And yet, as a child, I never found myself perplexed by any of it.
Of course it was odd, but within my imagination, anything was possible. Today,
I read the story and find myself analyzing every page, questioning and
critiquing the underlying statements Carroll was making. Perhaps that’s the
beauty of his work… while young children enthusiastically accept it for its
playful imaginativeness; adults are struck by its deeper implications.
As many critics point out, Alice in Wonderland is not the purely innocent story we experience
it as when we are children. There is always an element of danger lurking behind
every scene or interaction Alice encounters in Wonderland. Drinking the bottle
marked “Drink Me,” which might contain poison, nearly drowning in her own
tears, becoming trapped in the White Rabbit’s home, meeting strange strangers,
and the Queen of Hearts’ threats are all examples of times when Alice is at
risk without ever really taking the threats seriously.
And yet Carroll seems to be attempting to idealize youth –
to make it into something beautiful and innocent that adults all wish to return
to. Perhaps it is Alice’s naiveté that grown-ups miss… being able to enjoy new
experiences without recognizing the harm that they also face. Whatever it is,
they find themselves reminiscing of their own Wonderlands, of their “simple
sorrows” and “simple joys,” and of “happy summer days” (Carroll, 99).
As I thought about my childhood – which I truly did enjoy,
and which I feel has not yet fully come to end – I realized that even as a
young adult I have idealized some of my memories and experiences. Most of it
was of a true, dream-like quality, but there were elements that frightened me.
Confusion and change occasionally crept into my happy dreamland and threatened
me. One such creeping fear manifested itself in a recurring nightmare – my only
recurring nightmare as a child – which I decided to make into a comic and
share, since it
affected me so deeply as a child.
For me, like Alice… dreams are not always full of wonder.
Bringing Wonderland to Life
http://www.pxleyes.com/blog/2011/01/36-pictures-that-look-photoshopped-but-are-not/
In the OED, wonder is described as “something that causes
astonishment.” Alice’s adventures to other places are marked by craziness and
chaos. It is a world where everyone is mad. However, if we look at the world
around us, we can find that we ourselves are living in a wonderland. Maybe Lewis Carroll wasn’t crazy…maybe Alice
woke up from her dream because she realized that the world is already full of
wonders. Just the idea that we can imagine and dream is wonder all by itself.
Wonderland is great, but the world is full of wonders and we should enjoy those
too. So let me point you to some of our own wonders, welcome to our wonderland.
1.
Stevie Wonder- Besides the fact that his last
name is Wonder…It is amazing how this guy can play the piano, and wow us all
with his songs and his talents. Stevie Wonder stands for the poetry and the
songs in Alice and Wonderland. Sometimes the only way to relate to someone or something
is to write it in a song (or poem).
2.
“Body is a Wonderland” by John Mayer- It is a great song, and
since Alice’s body goes through a lot of changes, it points to the idea that the
body itself is amazing. Alice’s body is accustomed to the craziness that is
Wonderland.
3.
Sweets and Sugar- so, we also have delicious
food, by the way, it’s close to valentine’s day, so you can be sure to find
little hearts with writing on them. Let us not forget that there is food that
is capable of making us…grow.
http://sliceofcake.deviantart.com/art/Alice-In-Wonderland-158310472
4.
And lastly…we have our own rabbit-hole! (101 N.
Tejon St. Colorado Springs, CO 80903).
http://www.yelp.com/biz_photos/the-rabbit-hole-colorado-springs?select=HIDyzP3kqP5vfwbc6uqaXA#HIDyzP3kqP5vfwbc6uqaXA
In conclusion, Alice
in Wonderland draws attention to the messiness of life, but it also brings
out an important aspect of the life of its readers. Alice in Wonderland is a good framework for how the world we live
in is full of wonders. Wonder is a good thing. It is easy to see, once we take
a step back, that we are living in a world of wonders. We ourselves get to
experience wonders every single day. In fact, I do believe, that we are luckier
than Alice. The only thing is that we have to be willing to go down the metaphorical
rabbit-hole, and chase whatever wonders we might find.
-Porschae
The Literal and Language in Wonderland
The word "literally" is often carelessly thrown around today ("I was literally seeing stars" or "This migrane is so bad, my head is literally going to explode"). The OED defines "literally" to mean "in a literal, exact, or actual sense; not figuratively, allegorically, etc." Confusingly enough, people usually use "literally" when they actually mean something figuratively. The fact that "literally" is constantly used to mean its opposite is something that reveals the flexibility and frailty of the English language. Lewis Carroll repeatedly mocks this aspect all throughout the Alice stories and therefore illustrates a theme of language manipulation.
In Alice in Wonderland, much of Alice's confusion is caused by the discrepancy between intended meaning and actual meaning in language. The majority of the characters that she meets often take what she says literally. In a similar way, the places, characters, and objects Alice interacts with sometimes are literal manifestations of their names.
All of this confusion shows that language can never be concrete. But as time goes on and our language develops, there seems to be no way to stop this trend unless we, as the March Hare says, "say what [we] mean" (55). However, the network of words that we use are themselves made of words, so it may not ever be possible to escape the signifer and only use the signified. Are we, then, trapped in our own version of Wonderland through language? (Figuratively speaking, of course.)
"literally, adv.". OED Online. December 2012. Oxford University Press. 7 February 2013 <http://0-www.oed.com.tiger.coloradocollege.edu/view/Entry/109061?redirectedFrom=literally>.
In Alice in Wonderland, much of Alice's confusion is caused by the discrepancy between intended meaning and actual meaning in language. The majority of the characters that she meets often take what she says literally. In a similar way, the places, characters, and objects Alice interacts with sometimes are literal manifestations of their names.
All of this confusion shows that language can never be concrete. But as time goes on and our language develops, there seems to be no way to stop this trend unless we, as the March Hare says, "say what [we] mean" (55). However, the network of words that we use are themselves made of words, so it may not ever be possible to escape the signifer and only use the signified. Are we, then, trapped in our own version of Wonderland through language? (Figuratively speaking, of course.)
"literally, adv.". OED Online. December 2012. Oxford University Press. 7 February 2013 <http://0-www.oed.com.tiger.coloradocollege.edu/view/Entry/109061?redirectedFrom=literally>.
A Fly's Lifespan
“‘And what does it live on?’
‘Weak tea with cream in it.’
A new difficulty came into Alice’s head. ‘Supposing it
couldn’t find any?’ she suggested.
‘Then it would die, of course.’
‘But that must happen very often,’ Alice remarked
thoughtfully.
‘It always happens,’ said the gnat.
After this, Alice was silent a moment or two, pondering”
(134).
The above quote occurs in Through the Looking Glass, and is a
discussion of the bread and butter fly, that gorgeous thing in the picture
above. Death often remains a threatening, shadowy presence through Alice in Wonderland. We see it in the poems, in the discussions of
animals dying, in the Queen of Hearts’ constant calls for decapitation. Yet the
absurdity of these examples often belies the gravity of death. This quote is
curious in the frankness of its comment on death and the tone with which it is
delivered. The line, “It always
happens,” is a very true but also striking comment on the inevitability of
death. But despite the acceptance of death it demonstrates, our tragic gnat
speaks this line with a certain amount of sadness, and Alice’s silence after
suggests the seriousness of this remark.
There are two great deaths in Alice in Wonderland to which this view
of things is particularly applicable, that being the deaths of the two dream-worlds
at the end of each story. There is no option of return to these dreams. The
first is clearly Alice’s dream, and the second is either Alice’s or the red
king’s dream. Both dreams, however, cease to exist when Alice awakens from
them. In other words, they die.
These two dreams, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass, share many
qualities with the bread and butter fly: they are similarly absurd, made of
familiar qualities arranged in new, strange ways, and also have a quality of
fragility to them. They each thrive on a certain delicate fare—the bread and
butter fly, its weak tea with cream, and the dreams, the imagination of a young
girl. The life of the bread and butter fly acts as a metaphor for the dreams as
a whole, its death the dream’s ending. Death is not near as much of a threat in
Wonderland as the fact that Alice will age. And in doing so, she will lose the
power to create these worlds. There will come a time when the dreams run out of
sustenance and so must die. Though this is certainly inevitable—the gnat, after
all, speaks of acceptance—the death of these dreams comes with a certain amount
of pain. The vision of adult Alice at the end of Wonderland is happy, but the idea of “happy summer days” carries
the suggestion of the end of those days (99). The poem ending Looking Glass is much more explicit in
its sense of tragedy: “Autumn frosts have slain July” (209). There is sadness
in the end of dreams just as there is in the death of the bread and butter fly.
Life and dreams become one in the
final line of the ending poem of Through
the Looking Glass. “Life, what is it but a dream?” (209). In their endings,
there is essentially no difference between life and dreams. Life is a dream,
from which we will eventually awaken. That awakening is our death. It is
curious, perhaps, that if this is so, Alice awakens from one dream into
another, but of course, death is guaranteed, life is not.
~Savannah Worth
Also, who doesn’t want a bread and butter fly t-shirt?
Growing Up Poem
Struggling to adapt to new rules,
Alice wants to grow up but doesn’t quite have the tools.
Filled with childish urges,
Her perspective is changed and with the “mad” world it
merges.
Questioning her identity as her body changes size,
Her emotions often fall and then rise.
Alice can’t avoid growing, she has no control,
Aging is inevitable, as time takes its toll.
She sometimes feels lonely and even anxious too,
But searches for belonging and understanding as most
children do.
Childhood
is a part of the cycle of life,
Enjoy it
while it’s happening but accept growing up, don’t let it cause strife.
grinning from ear to ear
"Please would you tell me," said Alice, a little timidly, "why your cat grins like that?" (47, Carroll)
http://lukeka-pow.blogspot.com/2010/06/cheshire-cat.html
After finishing both Alice in Wonderland and Through the
Looking-Glass I decided to think back and decide who my favorite character was,
and I soon definitively came up with the Cheshire Cat. I began to analyze its
presence in Wonderland as well as the disappearance in the Looking-Glass world.
My interest sparked after reading Nina Auerbach’s critical
essay “Alice in Wonderland: A Curious Child”. She claims, “The Cheshire Cat is
a late addition to the book”, and the “only creature in Wonderland whom [Alice]
calls her ‘friend’” (341, Auebach). I found this curious because the Cheshire
Cat is such a crucial character to the book, why would Carroll feel the need to
add the menacing grin after a few revisions?
The first encounter with the Cheshire Cat comes at arguably
one of the most disturbing and eerie parts of the book, when Alice comes of the
house of the Duchess, the cook, and the baby. The scene is terrifying as she
walks into the room to the overwhelming aroma of pepper, a screaming baby, an
aggressive Duchess, and a cook who flings utensils with no rhyme or reason,
Alice “jumping up and down in an agony of terror” (48, Carroll), looks for some
logically refuge. She becomes hesitantly relieved at the sight of a familiar
creature, but still skeptical at its large grin. When Alice escapes the
madhouse she rescues the child, whom then turns into a pig, and suddenly, the
Cheshire Cat appears again.
Alice asks the Cheshire Cat which way she should go,
immediately initiating a weak sense of trust between the cat and herself.
Although the Cheshire Cat doesn’t give her a straightforward answer the
response is strangely logical and Alice does not pursue it further.
The Cheshire Cat next asks what became of the baby and Alice
tells him he turned into a pig, the Cheshire Cat replies, “I thought it would”
(52, Carroll), showing a facet of wisdom that is not present in the other
characters of Wonderland. The Cheshire Cat also has a sort of self-awareness
the other characters don’t have when he controls his appearing and
disappearing, to the frustration of Alice. Auebach claims the Cheshire Cat, “is
the only creature to make explicit the identification between Alice and the
madness of Wonderland” (341, Auebach) when he says, “we’re all mad here. I’m
mad. You’re mad” (51, Carroll). He is the
only character aware of his own madness.
Without the Cheshire Cat the reader would not come to the
conclusion that Wonderland is indeed a place of madness, however it is important
Alice knows it so she can fight the madness with attempted maturation and
logic. Without the Cheshire Cat, Alice, ironically, would be seen as a mad
character as well because she would be unaware of her madness existing in
Wonderland.
The Cheshire Cat does not make an appearance in Through the
Looking-Glass for a seemingly obvious reason after close readings of its
purpose in Wonderland. Alice has matured from her trip to Wonderland, and no
longer needs a guide to keep her sanity in check. Although I miss the presence
of the large grin, I feel the absence of the Cheshire Cat is a tribute to the
progression of Alice.
Thursday, February 7, 2013
Alice in Child-land
Alice
in Child-land: Carroll’s Glorification of Childhood and Repulsion towards
Adulthood
Those were the days... (Credit: http://3.bp.blogspot.com) |
One
of the greatest ironies of the world involves growing up—children long to be
adults, and adults long to be children. The adult longing for their lost
childhood is especially relevant in Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland, where we are whisked away into a world of
talking animals and food that can make one shrink to the size of a mouse or
grow to the size of a tree in a matter of moments. Following a seven-year-old
Alice in Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland
and a seven-and-a-half-year-old Alice
in Through the Looking-Glass and What
Alice Found There, we are faced with a cruel reality: we are not children
anymore. The days of the Mock Turtle, Gryphon and Jabberwocky paying us visits,
for most of us, is at an end. Even if we are very imaginative, or a child at
heart, it is difficult to go back to that place as an adult with adult
responsibilities. This was a fixation of Carroll’s (many 19th
century writers were similarly intrigued by children and childhood), and one
that we see clearly in his Alice
novels. What I am interested in is in what ways he places children on a
pedestal (juxtaposed with a less desirable adult life) in the Alice series and how our reading of the
novel is affected accordingly.
In Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, Alice
recounts an elaborate dream she had involving talking animals, incidences of
growing and shrinking, and strange things in general. At a surface level reading,
the story is about a girl’s various encounters with the inhabitants of
Wonderland and what she draws from them. The conclusion she seems to reach is
that growing up is overrated. All the animals she meets tend to be easily
offended, unnecessarily bossy, and quick to contradict her every sentence. They
seem to symbolize adults, offering a glimpse into her own future when she joins
those ranks herself. If a relatively short dream includes so many unpleasant encounters,
what awaits her in reality, with the rest of her adult life full of such unpleasant
meetings? Unlike most children, after her dream she does not seem incredibly
eager to be older or be an adult.
Come on, would you want to be an adult after playing croquet with a flamingo?! (Credit: http://upload.wikimedia.org) |
One
specific occurrence that I feel is important to isolate is Alice’s “abduction”
of the Duchess’ baby. Fearing it will be murdered, Alice takes it upon herself
to take the child and protect it. Her maternal instincts quickly wear off,
however, when the child transforms into a grunting piglet. This shows her
rejection of adult roles, like motherhood, and her repulsion towards the
thought of being forced into such a situation. Luckily, she is a child, and is
not obligated to take care of someone else’s
child, especially if it isn’t human. She lets the pig go, giving it no further
thought except to mention it in passing to the Cheshire cat. (Carroll 49-53)
Uh... Am I the only one who would prefer the pig? (Credit: http://www.kcconfidential.com/) |
In Through the Looking-Glass, Alice embarks
on yet another journey, this time around entertaining
herself with a game of chess in which she is a pawn. She seems more sensitive
this time around, checking herself more often for fear of hurting the feelings
of others. She is able to have pleasanter encounters overall, but what she is
to become is clearer to us: we can see she is growing up. Her best friend from
the first book, for one thing, has become a mother. Dinah the cat has kittens
that she is constantly grooming and caring for, and Alice similarly takes on a
motherly role, scolding the black kitten when it misbehaves (Carroll 107-109). We
also see Alice in a motherly role with the two queens who fall asleep on her
shoulders (Carroll 197), and also with the White knight who is constantly
falling off his horse and assisted by Alice as a parent would help its child
back onto a bike (185-186). (At the same time, the presence of the White knight
also explores the idea of Alice’s sexual maturing, as she is a prize to be won
from the Red knight who captures her first).
Like this, only with a full-grown man and a horse (Credit: http://upload.wikimedia.org) |
The
most important scene in Through the
Looking-Glass for me is when she transitions from pawn Alice to Queen
Alice. As Queen Alice, her temper worsens, as when she rings to be let into the
house and no one allows her entrance (Carroll 198-199). She throws a small
tantrum and barges in anyway. At dinner, she contradicts the Red queen by
ordering the pudding back to the table, and even more surprisingly cuts it
after it has made itself known to be a living thing (200-201). With the title
of Queen, Alice becomes very much like the characters she has encountered, more
adult-like, and it is not a pretty picture. In fact, she is whisked out of the land shortly after becoming this way, as if there is no place there for a dreamer who has begun to mature into an adult and act as such
(205-206).
In the
Alice series, childhood is glorified
and made out to be something quite desirable. Adult responsibilities and traits
are not looked upon very well in either novel, while childlike traits are
revered. Alice’s wild imagination gives us these wonderful stories, and her way
of viewing the world makes us long for a similar existence. We would never want
for anything if we could allow our minds to explore the imaginary world of
Wonderland as Alice’s can, and that is something to envy indeed. Carroll
certainly wants us to see it that way, that is. Consider the closing lines of Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland:
“Lastly,
she pictured to herself how this same little sister of hers would, in the
after-time, be herself a grown woman; and how she would keep, through all her
riper years, the simple and loving heart of her childhood: and how she would
gather about her other little children, and make their eyes bright and eager
with many a strange tale, perhaps even with the dream of Wonderland of long
ago: and how she would feel with all their simple sorrows, and find a pleasure
in all their simple joys, remembering her own child-life, and the happy summer
days.” (Carroll, 99)
And what a childhood it was! (http://www.thefeaturedcreature.com/) |
While
this is a beautiful sentiment, it is in its own way a little heartbreaking. As
a mother, Alice finds happiness through re-examining her childhood, and
reliving it through her own children. There is something sorrowful in
reminiscing, a strong yearning to return to the happy summer days when she was
a child. Even though she has retained the “simple and loving heart of her
childhood,” it is still her childhood
that she is fixated on. It is what she experienced as a youth that follows her
now into adulthood, and not being an adult that pleases her. There is no
mention of her being happily married, not even a word spared for the father of
her children. She is trapped in the past, only able to remember what happiness was like, but is she truly happy? Carroll
doesn’t seem to think so, and based on what we’ve read, we might not be so
quick to disagree with him.
~Justine
Camacho
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)